Regulating vaccination: a comparative study
Mandatory vaccination is seen as a landmark in public health. It has allowed all countries to effectively deal with several diseases such as small pox, polio. States usually follow a policy of mandatory vaccination in order to prevent the diseases from ever happening based on the principle of herd immunity. However, such a mandatory practice has raised issues regarding the risks associated with the administration of such vaccines, whenever any adverse effect arises. The United States of America has been grappling with the problem of mandatory vaccination and its legality since the beginning of the twentieth century and has an established system of dealing with this kind of issues. A study of the U.S system is extremely important since India which is highly involved in the vaccination program does not have an effective vaccination redressal mechanism, so the U.S. experience can be seen as a blueprint.
Funding. No funding has been obtained and used for this paper writing.
Conflict of interest. Authors declare no conflict of interest.
Contribution. Concept and design of study, data collection and processing – Goyal K. and Dosajh K.; writing – Dosajh K.; editing – Goyal K.; approval of the final version of the article and responsibility for the integrity of all parts of the article – Goyal K. and Dosajh K.
For citation: Goyal K., Dosajh K. Regulating vaccination: a comparative study. Infektsionnye bolezni: novosti, mneniya, obuchenie [Infectious Diseases: News, Opinions, Training]. 2022; 11 (2): 14–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33029/2305-3496-2022-11-2-14-18
1. Galva J.E., et al. Public health strategy and the police powers of the state. Public Health Rep. 2005; 120 (suppl 1): 20–7.
2. Smith P.J., et al. Highlights of historical events leading to national surveillance of vaccination coverage in the United States. Public Health Rep. 2011; 126 (suppl 2): 3–12.
3. Weithorn L.A., Reiss D.R. Legal approaches to promoting parental compliance with childhood immunization recommendations. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2018; 14 (7): 1610–7.
4. Goodman R.A., et al. Law in Public Health Practice. New York, 2007.
5. Brougher C. Religious exemptions for mandatory health care programs: a legal analysis. CRS Rep. 2012. RL34708.
6. Blake V. The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act and the supreme Court’s interpretation. AMA J Ethics. 2012; 14 (1): 31–4.
7. Ravikumar T.S., Abraham G. We need a leap in healthcare spending. The Hindu. 2019 Feb 7. URL: https://www.thehindu.com/opinion/op-ed/we-need-a-leap-in-healthcare-spending/article26196313.ece
8. Kumar K.P.N. Controversial vaccine studies: why is Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation under fire from critics In India? The Economic Times. 2014 Aug 31. URL: https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/industry/healthcare/biotech/healthcare/controversial-vaccine-studies-why-is-bill-melinda-gates-foundation-under-fire-from-critics-in-india/articleshow/41280050.cms
9. Hindu. Parents’ consent needed for measles vaccination, High Court tells govt. The Hindu. 2019 Jan 23. URL: https://www.thehindu.com/news/cities/Delhi/parents-consent-needed-for-measles-vaccination-high-court-tells-govt/article2606 4939.ece