Antibiotic resistance of Klebsiella pneumoniae against the background of the COVID-19 pandemic: experience of the multidisciplinary hospital

Abstract

Frequency of bacterial co-infections among patients with COVID-19 is not high, and over-prescribing of antibiotics may contribute the selection of resistant strains of enterobacteria and gram-negative non-fermenting bacteria.

The aim of the study was to assess the local features of antibiotic resistance of K. pneumoniae and its genetic mechanisms against background of the COVID-19 infection pandemic.

Material and methods. There was selected 37 carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae strains isolated in 2016, 2017 and 2020 from hospitalized patients, including 15 strains, isolated from patients with COVID-19 infection. Minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of meropenem and colistin were determined by broth microdilution method. Determination of MICs of eravacycline, ceftazidime/avibactam, meropenem/vaborbactam, imipenem/relebactam was performed using Sensititre diagnostic system on EUMDROXF plates. Susceptibility to 11 combinations of 2 antibiotics was detected by modified method of multiply combination bactericidal testing. For 4 K. pneumoniae strains high-throughput sequencing was performed, followed with the subsequent search for determinants of antibiotic resistance and virulence, assessment of plasmid profiles.

Results. All strains were resistant to meropenem (MIC50 32 mg/l, MIC90 128 mg/l) and produced KPC and OXA-48 carbapenemases. Strains isolated in 2016–2017 were susceptible to colistin (MIC ≤2 mg/l), in 2020 only 26.7% of the strains retained their susceptibility (MIC50 64 mg/l, MIC90 256 mg/l). Susceptibility to combinations of two antibiotics with colistin included reduced from 84.6–100% in 2016–2017 till 26.6–66.7% in 2020. The strains isolated in 2020 retained their susceptibility to ceftazidime/avibactam (MIC ≤1 mg/l). 5 strains resistant to cefiderocol with a MIC 8 mg/l were identified. Strains 2564 and 3125 isolated in 2020 from sputum of patients with COVID-19 infection belonged to different sequence-types (ST12 and ST23) and contained the blaOXA-48 carbapenemase gene, additionally strain 2564 contained the blaKPC-27carbapenemase gene. Resistance to colistin was caused by inactivation of the mgrB genes due to insertion of IS1 and IS5-like transposons.

Conclusion. The performed genetic studies demonstrate a diversity of mechanisms of antibiotic resistance in K. pneumoniae leading to the formation of resistance including to antibiotics that haven’t been used in Belarus till now.

Funding. The study was performed as part of the task «Study of biological and molecular-genetic mechanisms of the formation of resistance to polymyxins in extensively drug resistant gram-negative bacteria and the rationale for combined antibiotic therapy of infections caused by them» SPSR «Fundamental and applied sciences for medicine», 2016–2020.

Conflicts of interest. The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Contribution. Idea and concept solution – Tapalski D.V.; design – Tapalski D.V., Generalov I.I.; the collection and processing of the material – Akulenok O.M., Okulich V.K., Leskova N.Yu., Antonova E.G.; performing microbiological studies – Karpova E.V., Tapalski D.V., Akulenok O.M.; performing molecular genetic studies – Karpova E.V., Osipkina O.V., Mozharovskaya L.V., Baranov O.Yu.; text design and editing – Tapalski D.V., Generalov I.I., Zhiltsov I.V.

Acknowledgments. The authors are grateful to KhimKhrom ALC, Minsk, for the Sensititer diagnostic systems provided for research.

Keywords:Klebsiella pneumoniae, antibiotic resistance, carbapenemases, colistin, cefiderocol, COVID-19 infection

For citation: Tapalski D.V., Karpova E.V., Akulenok O.M., Okulich V.K., Generalov I.I., Leskova N.Yu., Antonova E.G., Zhiltsov I.V., Osipkina O.V., Mozharovskaya L.V., Baranov O.Yu. Antibiotic resistance of Klebsiella pneumoniae against the background of the COVID-19 pandemic: experience of the multidisciplinary hospital. Infektsionnye bolezni: novosti, mneniya, obuchenie [Infectious Diseases: News, Opinions, Training]. 2021; 10 (3): 15–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33029/2305-3496-2021-10-3-15-22 (in Russian)

1. Nieuwlaat R., Mbuagbaw L., Mertz D., et al. COVID-19 and antimicrobial resistance: parallel and interacting health emergencies. Clin Infect Dis. 2021; 72 (9): 1657–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciaa773

2. Monnet D., Harbarth S. Will coronavirus disease (COVID-19) have an impact on antimicrobial resistance? Euro Surveill. 2020; 25 (45): 2001886. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.45.2001886

3. Zhou F., Yu T., Du R., Fan G., et al. Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet. 2020; 395 (10 229): 1054–62. DOI: https://doi. org/10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30566-3

4. Lansbury L., Lim B., Baskaran V., Lim W. Co-infections in people with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Infect. 2020; 81 (2): 266–75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JINF.2020.05.046

5. Yang P., Chen Y., Jiang S., Shen P., et al. Association between antibiotic consumption and the rate of carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria from China based on 153 tertiary hospitals data in 2014. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2018; 7: 137. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/ s13756-018-0430-1

6. Ruiz J., Gordon M., Villarreal E., et al. Influence of antibiotic pressure on multi-drug resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae colonisation in critically ill patients. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2019; 8: 38. DOI: https://doi. org/10.1186/s13756-019-0484-8

7. ISO 20776-1:2006 «Clinical laboratory testing and in vitro diagnostic test systems – susceptibility testing of infectious agents and evaluation of performance of antimicrobial susceptibility test devices – Part 1: Reference method for testing the in vitro activity of antimicrobial agents against rapidly growing aerobic bacteria involved in infectious diseases».

8. European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility testing (EUCAST). Breakpoint tables for interpretation of MICs and zone diameters. Ver. 11.0. 2021. URL: www.eucast.org/clinical_breakpoints/ (date of access March 5, 2021)

9. Lang B., Aaron S., Ferris W., Hebert P., MacDonald N. Multiple combination bactericidal antibiotic testing for patients with cystic fibrosis infected with multiresistant strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000; 162 (6): 2241–5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1164/ ajrccm.162.6.2005018

10. Tapalski D.V. Susceptibility to antibiotic combinations among nosocomial carbapenemaseproducing Gramnegative bacteria isolated in Belarus. Klinicheskaya mikrobiologiya i antimikrobnaya khimioterapiya [Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobial Chemotherapy]. 2018; 20 (3): 182–91. (in Russian)

11. Marr C., Russo T. Hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae: a new public health threat. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2019; 17 (2): 71–3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14787210.2019.1555470

12. Struve C, Roe C., Stegger M., et al. Mapping the evolution of hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae. mBio. 2015; 6 (4): e00630. DOI: https:// doi.org/10.1128/MBIO.00630-15

13. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Surveillance of antimicrobial resistance in Europe 2018. Stockholm: ECDC, 2019.

14. Central Asian and Eastern European surveillance of antimicrobial resistance. Annual report 2019. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe, 2019.

15. Li Z., Cao Y., Yi L., et al. Emergent polymyxin resistance: end of an era? Open Forum Infect Dis. 2019; 6 (10): ofz368. DOI: https://doi. org/10.1093/ofid/ofz368

16. Ah Y., Kim A., Lee J. Colistin resistance in Klebsiella pneumoniae. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2014; 44 (1): 8–15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j. ijantimicag.2014.02.016

17. Smith J., Rybak J., Claeys K. Imipenem-cilastatin-relebactam: a novel β-lactam-β-lactamase inhibitor combination for the treatment of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative infections. Pharmacotherapy. 2020; 40 (4): 343–56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/phar.2378

18. Petty L., Henig O., Patel T., et al. Infect Drug. Resist. 2018; 11: 1461–72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S150447

19. Sato T., Yamawaki K. Cefiderocol: discovery, chemistry, and in vivo profiles of a novel siderophore cephalosporin. Clin Infect Dis. 2019; 69 (suppl 7): S538–43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciz826

20. Zhanel G., Golden A., Zelenitsky S., et al. Cefiderocol: a siderophore cephalosporin with activity against carbapenem-resistant and multidrugresistant Gram-negative bacilli. Drugs. 2019; 79 (3): 271–89. DOI: https:// doi.org/10.1007/s40265-019-1055-2

21. Kohira N., Hackel M., Ishioka Y., et al. Reduced susceptibility mechanism to cefiderocol, a siderophore cephalosporin, among clinical isolates from a global surveillance programme (SIDERO-WT-2014). J Glob Antimicrob Resist. 2020; 22: 738–41. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. jgar.2020.07.009

22. Kuzmenkov A., Trushin I., Vinogradova A., et al. AMRmap: an interactive web platform for analysis of antimicrobial resistance surveillance data in Russia. Front Microbiol. 2021; 12: 620002. DOI: https://doi. org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.620002

23. Rawson T., Moore L., Zhu N., et al. Bacterial and fungal coinfection in individuals with coronavirus: a rapid review to support COVID-19 antimicrobial prescribing. Clin Infect Dis. 2020; 71 (9): 2459–68. DOI: https://doi. org/10.1093/cid/ciaa530

All articles in our journal are distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0 license)

CHIEF EDITOR
Aleksandr V. Gorelov
Academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences, MD, Head of Infection Diseases and Epidemiology Department of the Scientific and Educational Institute of Clinical Medicine named after N.A. Semashko ofRussian University of Medicine, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Professor of the Department of Childhood Diseases, Clinical Institute of Children's Health named after N.F. Filatov, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Deputy Director for Research, Central Research Institute of Epidemiology, Rospotrebnadzor (Moscow, Russian Federation)

Journals of «GEOTAR-Media»