Practice and personal-oriented model of infectious diseases in the context of digitalization of medical education

• Konstantin V. Zorin

Abstract

Digitalization of medical education is one of the trends in the educational process. Taking into account the traditions and innovations in pedagogy, as well as the characteristics of the cognitive sphere of contemporary medical students, most likely, the best approach for conducting a lesson in the form of contact work is a combination of network/mobile learning with obligatory direct communication of doctor-teacher and student. The article presents the developed methodical forms of organizing the educational process on specific topics of the discipline "Infectious diseases".

Keywords:higher medical education, practice-oriented and person-oriented pedagogy, infectious diseases

References

1. Kudryavaya N.V., Zorin K.V., Smirnova N.B., Anashkina E.V., Ukolova E.M., Suvorova E.V. Moral and education activities of the physician-teacher. Textbook. Edited by N.V. Kudryavaya. Moscow: RIO MSMSU, 2015: 384 p. (in Russian)

2. Kudryavaya N.V., Ukolova E.M. Molchanov A.S., Smirnova N.B. Zorin K.V. Physician-teacher in a changing world: tradition and innovation Edited by N.D. Yushchuk. Moscow, 2005: 131. (in Russian)

3. Kudryavaya N.V., Zorin K.V., Smirnova N.B., Anashkina E.V. Psychology and Pedagogy in medical education: a textbook for students of higher education institutions. Edited by N.V. Kudryavaya. Moscow: Knorus, 2016: 320 p. (in Russian)

4. Kudryavaya N.V., Ukolova E.M., Smirnova N.B., Voloshin E.A., Zorin K.V. Pedagogy in medicine: a textbook for students of higher medical educational institutions. Moscow: Akademiya, 2012. (in Russian)

5. Berezovskaya I.P Problem of methodological substantiation of the concept «clip thinking». Nauchno-tekhnicheskie vedomosti Sankt-Peter-burgskogo gosudarstvennogo politekhnicheskogo universiteta. Gumani-tarnye i obshchestvennye nauki [Scientific and Technical Bulletin of the Saint Petersburg State Polytechnic University. Humanities and Social Sciences]. 2015; (2): 133-8. (in Russian)

6. Sedykh A.V., Shalamova P.E. Evaluation of cognitive function at students of 1 course. Identification of individual memory peculiarities. In: Materials of the IX International Student Scientific Conference «Student Scientific Forum». URL: https://www.scienceforum.ru/2017/article/2017039891 (in Russian)

7. Staritsyna O.A. Mosaic thinking vs education. Who is to blame and what to do? Azimut nauchnykh issledovaniy: pedagogika i psikhologiya [Azimuth of Scientific Research: Pedagogy and Psychology]. 2018; 7 (2): 270-4. (in Russian)

8. Zemlinskaya T.E., Fersman N.G. Teaching methods and techniques in the context of teaching students with clip thinking cognitive style. Nauchno-tekhnicheskie vedomosti Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo politekhnicheskogo universiteta. Gumanitarnye i obshchestvennye nauki [Scientific and Technical Bulletin of the Saint Petersburg State Polytechnic University. Humanities and Social Sciences]. 2016; (4): 153-60. (in Russian)

9. Strekalova N.B. The impact of information technology on the quality of the educational process. Izvestiya Samarskogo nauchnogo tsentra Ros-siyskoy akademii nauk. Sotsial’nye, gumanitarnye, medico-biologicheskie nauki [Proceedings of the Samara Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Social, Humanitarian, Medical and Biological Sciences]. 2017; 19 (6): 48-53. (in Russian)

All articles in our journal are distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0 license)